What can touch tell us, and what can it not?

How can consensual touch communicate care, and where does interpretation begin?

Dacher KeltnerGreater Good Science Center, about eight minutes. His reading is not the same thing as every study he names.

One review found that an object, or a robot, eased the body about as much as a person, and the mood less. The body answered. It did not say what the touch meant, or whether anyone had been tender.

Touch

Touch, measured

Packheiser and colleagues, 2024, reviewed touch against no touch. In the meta-analysis, 137 studies and 12,966 people. For adults, touch was associated with less pain, less depression, and less anxiety. People know when they are being touched, so the studies cannot be blind.

A hand, a threat

Sixteen married women were scanned under threat of shock. Holding a spouse’s hand reduced the threat response more than holding a stranger’s, and more so when the marriage was rated higher. Coan, Schaefer, and Davidson measured that difference.

Sources
  1. J. Packheiser, H. Hartmann, K. Fredriksen, V. Gazzola, C. Keysers, and F. Michon, “A Systematic Review and Multivariate Meta-analysis of the Physical and Mental Health Benefits of Touch Interventions,” Nature Human Behaviour 8 (2024): 1088–1107.
  2. James A. Coan, Hillary S. Schaefer, and Richard J. Davidson, “Lending a Hand,” Psychological Science 17, no. 12 (2006): 1032–39.
  3. Francis McGlone, Johan Wessberg, and Håkan Olausson, “Discriminative and Affective Touch: Sensing and Feeling,” Neuron 82, no. 4 (2014): 737–55.
  4. Dacher Keltner, “Dacher Keltner on Touch,” Greater Good Science Center.